0.03/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JnP6RmJ2hd true 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 14:30:43 EDT 2021 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.33 % Running portfolio for 120 s 0.12/0.33 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.12/0.33 % Number of cores: 8 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.12/0.34 % Running in HO mode 0.49/0.63 % Total configuration time : 828 0.49/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 983 0.49/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 122.875 0.58/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 47s 0.60/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 47s 0.60/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 47s 0.60/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 18s 0.60/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 53s 0.60/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 41s 0.61/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 24s 0.61/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 35s 0.61/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 53s 17.56/2.83 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh. 17.56/2.83 % running E: timeout 11 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.JnP6RmJ2hd/e_inputcaf445 --cpu-limit=9 --auto-schedule -s -p 17.56/2.83 % done 44 iterations in 2.042s 17.56/2.83 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 17.56/2.83 % SZS output start Refutation 17.56/2.83 thf(subst_type, type, subst: $tType). 17.56/2.83 thf(term_type, type, term: $tType). 17.56/2.83 thf(sh_type, type, sh: subst). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoasinduction_lem3aa_type, type, hoasinduction_lem3aa: $o). 17.56/2.83 thf(sub_type, type, sub: term > subst > term). 17.56/2.83 thf(push_type, type, push: term > subst > subst). 17.56/2.83 thf(id_type, type, id: subst). 17.56/2.83 thf(axvarid_type, type, axvarid: $o). 17.56/2.83 thf(lam_type, type, lam: term > term). 17.56/2.83 thf(one_type, type, one: term). 17.56/2.83 thf(axvarshift_type, type, axvarshift: $o). 17.56/2.83 thf(comp_type, type, comp: subst > subst > subst). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoasinduction_lem3_lthm_type, type, hoasinduction_lem3_lthm: $o). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoasinduction_lem3_type, type, hoasinduction_lem3: $o). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoaslam_type, type, hoaslam: subst > (subst > term > term) > term). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoasinduction_lem3_lthm, axiom, hoasinduction_lem3_lthm = 17.56/2.83 (( axvarid ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( axvarshift ) => ( ( hoasinduction_lem3aa ) => ( hoasinduction_lem3 ) ) ))). 17.56/2.83 thf('0', plain, 17.56/2.83 (( hoasinduction_lem3_lthm ) = 17.56/2.83 ( ( axvarid ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( axvarshift ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( hoasinduction_lem3aa ) => ( hoasinduction_lem3 ) ) ) )), 17.56/2.83 define([status(thm)])). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoasinduction_lem3, axiom, hoasinduction_lem3 = 17.56/2.83 (![P:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![M:subst,A:term,N:subst,K:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( P @ M @ A @ ( comp @ K @ N ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ ( comp @ M @ K ) @ ( sub @ A @ K ) @ N ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![M:subst,A:term,N:subst,K:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( P @ ( comp @ M @ K ) @ ( sub @ A @ K ) @ N ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ M @ A @ ( comp @ K @ N ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![F:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![M:subst,A:term,N:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( F @ M @ A ) @ N ) = 17.56/2.83 ( F @ ( comp @ M @ N ) @ ( sub @ A @ N ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![A:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( P @ id @ A @ id ) => ( P @ id @ ( F @ id @ A ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ 17.56/2.83 id @ 17.56/2.83 ( hoaslam @ id @ ( ^[M:subst,A:term]: ( F @ M @ A ) ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![A:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![B:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( P @ id @ B @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ id @ ( sub @ A @ ( push @ B @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ id @ ( lam @ A ) @ id ) ) ) ) ) ))). 17.56/2.83 thf('1', plain, 17.56/2.83 (( hoasinduction_lem3 ) = 17.56/2.83 ( ![X4:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X6:subst,X8:term,X10:subst,X12:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X4 @ X6 @ X8 @ ( comp @ X12 @ X10 ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ ( comp @ X6 @ X12 ) @ ( sub @ X8 @ X12 ) @ X10 ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X14:subst,X16:term,X18:subst,X20:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X4 @ ( comp @ X14 @ X20 ) @ ( sub @ X16 @ X20 ) @ X18 ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ X14 @ X16 @ ( comp @ X20 @ X18 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X22:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X24:subst,X26:term,X28:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( X22 @ X24 @ X26 ) @ X28 ) = 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ ( comp @ X24 @ X28 ) @ ( sub @ X26 @ X28 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X30:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X4 @ id @ X30 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ id @ ( X22 @ id @ X30 ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ 17.56/2.83 id @ 17.56/2.83 ( hoaslam @ 17.56/2.83 id @ ( ^[V_1:subst,V_2:term]: ( X22 @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) ) @ 17.56/2.83 id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X32:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X34:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X4 @ id @ X34 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ id @ ( sub @ X32 @ ( push @ X34 @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ id @ ( lam @ X32 ) @ id ) ) ) ) ) ) )), 17.56/2.83 define([status(thm)])). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoasinduction_lem3aa, axiom, hoasinduction_lem3aa = 17.56/2.83 (![P:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![F:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![M:subst,A:term,N:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( F @ M @ A ) @ N ) = 17.56/2.83 ( F @ ( comp @ M @ N ) @ ( sub @ A @ N ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![A:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( P @ id @ A @ id ) => ( P @ id @ ( F @ id @ A ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ 17.56/2.83 id @ ( hoaslam @ id @ ( ^[M:subst,A:term]: ( F @ M @ A ) ) ) @ 17.56/2.83 id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![A:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![B:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( P @ id @ B @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ id @ ( sub @ A @ ( push @ B @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( P @ id @ ( lam @ ( sub @ A @ ( push @ one @ sh ) ) ) @ id ) ) ) ))). 17.56/2.83 thf('2', plain, 17.56/2.83 (( hoasinduction_lem3aa ) = 17.56/2.83 ( ![X4:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X6:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X8:subst,X10:term,X12:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( X6 @ X8 @ X10 ) @ X12 ) = 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ ( comp @ X8 @ X12 ) @ ( sub @ X10 @ X12 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X14:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X4 @ id @ X14 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ id @ ( X6 @ id @ X14 ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ 17.56/2.83 id @ 17.56/2.83 ( hoaslam @ 17.56/2.83 id @ ( ^[V_1:subst,V_2:term]: ( X6 @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) ) @ 17.56/2.83 id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X16:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X18:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X4 @ id @ X18 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ id @ ( sub @ X16 @ ( push @ X18 @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X4 @ id @ ( lam @ ( sub @ X16 @ ( push @ one @ sh ) ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) )), 17.56/2.83 define([status(thm)])). 17.56/2.83 thf(hoaslam, axiom,(( hoaslam ) = 17.56/2.83 (^[M:subst,F:( subst > term > term )]: ( lam @ ( F @ sh @ one ) )))). 17.56/2.83 thf('3', plain, 17.56/2.83 (( hoaslam ) = 17.56/2.83 ( ^[M:subst,F:( subst > term > term )]: ( lam @ ( F @ sh @ one ) ) )), 17.56/2.83 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [hoaslam])). 17.56/2.83 thf('4', plain, 17.56/2.83 (( hoaslam ) = 17.56/2.83 ( ^[V_1:subst,V_2:( subst > term > term )]: ( lam @ ( V_2 @ sh @ one ) ) )), 17.56/2.83 define([status(thm)])). 17.56/2.83 thf(axvarshift, axiom, axvarshift = (( push @ one @ sh ) = ( id ))). 17.56/2.83 thf('5', plain, (( axvarshift ) = ( ( push @ one @ sh ) = ( id ) )), 17.56/2.83 define([status(thm)])). 17.56/2.83 thf(axvarid, axiom, axvarid = (![A:term]: ( ( sub @ A @ id ) = ( A ) ))). 17.56/2.83 thf('6', plain, 17.56/2.83 (( axvarid ) = ( ![X4:term]: ( ( sub @ X4 @ id ) = ( X4 ) ) )), 17.56/2.83 define([status(thm)])).thf(thm, conjecture, (hoasinduction_lem3_lthm)). 17.56/2.83 thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture, 17.56/2.83 (( ![X4:term]: ( ( sub @ X4 @ id ) = ( X4 ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ( push @ one @ sh ) = ( id ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X6:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X8:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X10:subst,X12:term,X14:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( X8 @ X10 @ X12 ) @ X14 ) = 17.56/2.83 ( X8 @ ( comp @ X10 @ X14 ) @ ( sub @ X12 @ X14 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X16:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X6 @ id @ X16 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ id @ ( X8 @ id @ X16 ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ id @ ( lam @ ( X8 @ sh @ one ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X18:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X20:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X6 @ id @ X20 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ id @ ( sub @ X18 @ ( push @ X20 @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ id @ ( lam @ ( sub @ X18 @ ( push @ one @ sh ) ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X22:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X24:subst,X26:term,X28:subst,X30:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ X24 @ X26 @ ( comp @ X30 @ X28 ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ ( comp @ X24 @ X30 ) @ ( sub @ X26 @ X30 ) @ X28 ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X32:subst,X34:term,X36:subst,X38:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ ( comp @ X32 @ X38 ) @ ( sub @ X34 @ X38 ) @ X36 ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ X32 @ X34 @ ( comp @ X38 @ X36 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X40:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X42:subst,X44:term,X46:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( X40 @ X42 @ X44 ) @ X46 ) = 17.56/2.83 ( X40 @ ( comp @ X42 @ X46 ) @ ( sub @ X44 @ X46 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X48:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ id @ X48 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ id @ ( X40 @ id @ X48 ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ id @ ( lam @ ( X40 @ sh @ one ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X50:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X52:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ id @ X52 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ id @ ( sub @ X50 @ ( push @ X52 @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ id @ ( lam @ X50 ) @ id ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 17.56/2.83 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, 17.56/2.83 (~( ( ![X4:term]: ( ( sub @ X4 @ id ) = ( X4 ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ( push @ one @ sh ) = ( id ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X6:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X8:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X10:subst,X12:term,X14:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( X8 @ X10 @ X12 ) @ X14 ) = 17.56/2.83 ( X8 @ ( comp @ X10 @ X14 ) @ ( sub @ X12 @ X14 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X16:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X6 @ id @ X16 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ id @ ( X8 @ id @ X16 ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ id @ ( lam @ ( X8 @ sh @ one ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X18:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X20:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X6 @ id @ X20 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ id @ ( sub @ X18 @ ( push @ X20 @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X6 @ 17.56/2.83 id @ ( lam @ ( sub @ X18 @ ( push @ one @ sh ) ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X22:( subst > term > subst > $o )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X24:subst,X26:term,X28:subst,X30:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ X24 @ X26 @ ( comp @ X30 @ X28 ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ ( comp @ X24 @ X30 ) @ ( sub @ X26 @ X30 ) @ X28 ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X32:subst,X34:term,X36:subst,X38:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ ( comp @ X32 @ X38 ) @ ( sub @ X34 @ X38 ) @ X36 ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ X32 @ X34 @ ( comp @ X38 @ X36 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X40:( subst > term > term )]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X42:subst,X44:term,X46:subst]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( sub @ ( X40 @ X42 @ X44 ) @ X46 ) = 17.56/2.83 ( X40 @ ( comp @ X42 @ X46 ) @ ( sub @ X44 @ X46 ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X48:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ id @ X48 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ id @ ( X40 @ id @ X48 ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ id @ ( lam @ ( X40 @ sh @ one ) ) @ id ) ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( ![X50:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( ![X52:term]: 17.56/2.83 ( ( X22 @ id @ X52 @ id ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ 17.56/2.83 id @ ( sub @ X50 @ ( push @ X52 @ id ) ) @ id ) ) ) => 17.56/2.83 ( X22 @ id @ ( lam @ X50 ) @ id ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )), 17.56/2.83 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 17.56/2.83 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 17.56/2.83 (~ (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : term]: (((sub @ Y0 @ id) = (Y0)))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((((push @ one @ sh) = (id))) => 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y0 : subst > term > subst > $o]: 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : subst > term > term]: 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ ( 17.56/2.83 ^[Y4 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (( 17.56/2.83 (sub @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ Y3) @ 17.56/2.83 Y4) = 17.56/2.83 (Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 comp @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ Y4) @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 sub @ 17.56/2.83 Y3 @ Y4))))))))))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((Y0 @ id @ Y2 @ 17.56/2.83 id) => (Y0 @ id @ 17.56/2.83 (Y1 @ id @ Y2) @ id)))))) => 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ id @ 17.56/2.83 (lam @ (Y1 @ sh @ one)) @ id)))))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((Y0 @ id @ Y2 @ id) => 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ id @ 17.56/2.83 (sub @ Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 (push @ Y2 @ id)) @ 17.56/2.83 id)))))) => 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ id @ 17.56/2.83 (lam @ 17.56/2.83 (sub @ Y1 @ (push @ one @ sh))) @ 17.56/2.83 id))))))))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : subst > term > subst > $o]: 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ ( 17.56/2.83 ^[Y4 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (( 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ 17.56/2.83 Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 comp @ 17.56/2.83 Y4 @ Y3)) => 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 comp @ 17.56/2.83 Y1 @ Y4) @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 sub @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ Y4) @ 17.56/2.83 Y3))))))))))))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ ( 17.56/2.83 ^[Y4 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (( 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 comp @ 17.56/2.83 Y1 @ Y4) @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 sub @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ Y4) @ 17.56/2.83 Y3) => 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ 17.56/2.83 Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 comp @ 17.56/2.83 Y4 @ Y3)))))))))))))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : subst > term > term]: 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (( 17.56/2.83 (!!) @ ( 17.56/2.83 ^[Y4 : subst]: 17.56/2.83 (( 17.56/2.83 (sub @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ Y3) @ 17.56/2.83 Y4) = 17.56/2.83 (Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 comp @ 17.56/2.83 Y2 @ Y4) @ 17.56/2.83 ( 17.56/2.83 sub @ 17.56/2.83 Y3 @ Y4))))))))))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((Y0 @ id @ Y2 @ 17.56/2.83 id) => (Y0 @ 17.56/2.83 id @ 17.56/2.83 (Y1 @ id @ Y2) @ 17.56/2.83 id)))))) => 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ id @ 17.56/2.83 (lam @ (Y1 @ sh @ one)) @ id)))))))) => 17.56/2.83 (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : term]: 17.56/2.83 (((Y0 @ id @ Y2 @ 17.56/2.83 id) => (Y0 @ id @ 17.56/2.83 (sub @ Y1 @ 17.56/2.83 (push @ Y2 @ id)) @ 17.56/2.83 id)))))) => 17.56/2.83 (Y0 @ id @ (lam @ Y1) @ id)))))))))))))))))))))), 17.56/2.83 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 17.56/2.83 thf(zip_derived_cl1548, plain, ($false), 17.56/2.83 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])). 17.56/2.83 17.56/2.83 % SZS output end Refutation 17.56/2.83 17.56/2.83 17.56/2.83 % Terminating... 18.40/2.96 % Runner terminated. 18.40/2.97 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 18.40/2.97 EOF